FEATURE


Ladies and Gentlemen, The Cinema is Now Closed:
The rather serious festival comes to an end with Polanski's The Pianist taking the Top Prize
By Grant Rosenberg

Cannes needs scandals, said actor Vincent Cassel at the press conference for the film Irreversible, so they manufacture them, warranted or not. What he said at the press conference made a lot of sense. More than a few journalists have asked questions to filmmakers and cast by stating, "Your film ______ is no doubt controversial…" even before the film has been seen by an audience beyond one press screening. It seems there is a predisposition to label something as controversial simply because that grabs attention, regardless of whether there has yet been an outcry or not. After all, a thing needs to be experienced by human beings in order to have a reaction for and or against it. Controversy cannot exist in a vacuum. It’s more of a misnomer, really. The anticipation of controversy based on something provocative has replaced the definition itself.

Monica Belucci

Having said all that, it seems clear that Cassel may not be right. The film Irreversible is not some innocent little movie with an unpopular notion or two. No, it is a film about a man who seeks revenge after his girlfriend is raped and facially disfigured. The story is told in reverse, a dozen separate scenes. The act of vengeance therefore comes at the beginning of the film, deliberately robbing our sense of justice, since we do not know at that time why the violent act takes place, whose side we are on, if the original perpetrator is being punished or why it is happening. We are disconnected from the rage of vengeance that is soaking the man who seeks it. We see this man get his faced bashed in, literally, by another man with a fire extinguisher. Normally when we see such a thing in films, it is shot a certain way, the two-dimensional view that allows us to understand the artifice of it. And the result is usually nothing more than a bloody nose. But here, we see it happen directly, a close-up side view. Your mind plays a trick on you, no matter how much a veteran of violent films you may be. Because we see it and we hear it and watch as his nose is flattened, then his face caved in with each successive slam of the butt of the extinguisher. From there, whether you in the audience have recovered or not, the story moves progressively backwards, like a pared down version of Memento, through the evening. We see the event that caused the need for revenge, where a woman is anally raped in a ten minute, unbroken shot. All this with dialog that rarely steers away from racist, sexist and homophobic profanity. There is more after that, where the film gradually becomes more interesting, bearable and even quite beautiful, but too many in the audience—those that are still there—are numb from the horrors that precede it.

Given that Cassel and Belucci are married in real life, and are quite a famous couple in Europe, comparisons to Eyes Wide Shut come to mind. In fact, director Noë indicated that the desire was to take over where Kubrick left off, where he was too staid to go, pushing the envelope of how we respond to peeking in at the intimacy of an actual couple. When asked if Belucci felt their relationship was exploited for the film, she said both exploited and celebrated. The most extreme films I’ve seen in the past few years have all come from France, such as Romance and Baise Moi, both which feature actual porn actors who have intercourse onscreen, and Noë’s own film Seul Contre Tous, (released in the U.S. as I Stand Alone) making Irreversible part of a probably unintentional trend of envelope pushing. Considering France’s consistent role in defining and redefining cinema since the beginning, this makes sense. And yet, I can’t decide, even days later, if the film has any merit at all, or if it is the closest thing yet of any major release to a snuff film. I was impressed with it technically and with its actors and their fearlessness, and as the shock of the two graphic scenes fades, I try to reflect on the rest of the film. But it is so extreme that its unrelenting desire to shock us seems distracting, two large red blots that stain everything else.

Until Irreversible, the most debatable film was Demonlover, an international production that takes place in France, Japan and the U.S. It was made by Olivier Assayas, who made the popular and respected film Irma Vep several years ago. Demonlover has the ambition of being a true 21st century film with its post-modern style and subject matter. Assayas spoke of reading the works of Don DeLillo as he wrote the screenplay. Connie Nielsen, Charles Berling, Chloe Sevigny and Gina Gershon are the main actors, and the film is about espionage in the corporate, global world. It is a drama and spy thriller, with a musical score from Sonic Youth and has some of that Japanese anime sex that is all the rage. People jeered and cheered after the film as they would later for Irreversible. Like that film, I don’t know if I think Demonlover is successful in what it is trying to do, but I still can’t get it out of my skin.

***

After his last film The Ninth Gate, a pulpy, silly eschatological thriller starring Johnny Depp, it was a surprise that Roman Polanski was making a long, solemn film about the Holocaust. The Pianist, which unexpectedly won the Palme d’Or, stars American actor Adrien Brody as a Polish Jew who survives in Warsaw for the duration of the war, despite the years of the ghetto and its liquidation, the deportation of all of his family and friends and the eventual destruction of Warsaw itself at the hands of the Nazis. Though there are more than a few excellent moments and ideas, I don’t think the film is successful. In fact, I was a bit disappointed compared to the press kit, with its stark, beautiful black and white matte photographs that gave a different impression. The film looks more like a TV movie, and does not really explore the events in ways that haven’t been done before in other films.

There is always a burden on films about the Holocaust, the attempt to portray horrific events of such magnitude in a way that does not cheapen the history, make them either trite, oversimplified or even sadistic. "Emotion pornography" is how David Mamet labeled Schindler’s List. Despite the impressive Adrien Brody, the film seems to be following a pattern of presentation. And yet, toward the end (skip the rest of this paragraph if you do not want to know the plot), already a bit emaciated and nearly on his last leg, he is discovered living in an attic of an abandoned house by a Nazi who helps him survive by bringing him food from the Nazi office and even the coat off his back. I found myself incredulous at the prospect of this notion. Immediately the film was lost on me, seemingly trading in logic for good drama. Politically it seemed a joke; the only Nazi whose name we learn is one of the "good ones." Elvis Mitchell pointed out in the New York Times that the film is a "bland, glib melodrama that softens its impact by robbing its protagonist of the resourcefulness and physical courage it must have taken to survive." At the end of the film a title card comes up and we learn that Wladyslaw Szpilman was indeed a real man, a well-known pianist in Poland who died two years ago at the age of 88. He was never able to locate the Nazi who helped him, a man who died in a Soviet prison camp in 1952, but befriended the man’s family. Suddenly I had to reevaluate it; this is a true event, documented in Szpilman’s own autobiography, and I am ridiculing as preposterous a relationship that actually took place. This is the complication of trying to make representative stories out of particular individual cases. One can object to a film itself as unsuccessful and simply not good, but politics of presentation has to stay out. This was one man’s experience of many, and like all films about history, the truth is stranger, more horrific and also more absurd than fiction.

***

Like its opening film, Hollywood Ending, the closing film is light. And Now, Ladies and Gentlemen… is a romance novel on the screen. Starring Jeremy Irons and famous French singer Patricia Kass in her first film, it is a laughable romp, the sprightly story of a jewel thief who experiences strange blackouts and finds companionship in a singer with the same little problem, though it doesn’t stop the two of them looking sexy throughout, on location in Paris, London and Morocco. There is sailing, smoky lounges, mystical oracles and dialogue that rivals the love story of Attack of the Clones. It is like a perfume commercial co-directed by Danielle Steel and John Cleese on a bad day. In reality, it is the latest film from Claude LeLouch the veteran filmmaker of A Man and A Woman and many other notable French films throughout the last fifty years. My biggest complaint is how cavalier it seemed to be about cancer, using brain tumors as plot devices. The press screening had laughter where it wasn’t intended, and everyone joked at its failure as a film… then ran to the press conference the next day to see its two stars. There had to be a reason that Irons was in this film, and it certainly wasn’t the words he had to say (Groaningly bad is the same in any language, and he had his share of off-the-cuff platitudes). "It enabled me to do many of the things I love doing. Sailing. Dressing up in a woman’s clothes [done for a jewelry story robbery]. I love singing, traveling… walking though deserted places with beautiful women."

***

Despite two or three films a day, I still did not manage to see all the films, and even missed a few that were in competition. But of those I saw, there were more than few that good or bad, provoked me in some way.

24 Hour Party PeopleThe story of the English music boom beginning with the Sex Pistols and the creation of bands like Joy Division. An entertaining story told in a self-referential almost meta-fictional sort of way.

Divine InterventionA fantasy comedy/drama about life between Jerusalem and the West Bank for a few Palestinians. It is quite a well-crafted poem of a film and in many ways gives a different look on life in an area that always looks violent. The last thing I was expecting was a funny, quiet film, and it won the jury prize.

AraratFrom Canadian Atom Egoyan, a look at the way events forgotten by history are presented, namely the Turkish massacre of the Armenians in 1915. The story takes place in the present day as a film about the events is being made. This is far from Egoyan’s best film, and has some very awkward and clunky moments, but it is quite engaging.

KedmaAn Israeli film about the week before statehood was declared. The film is a series of long scenes, each a one act play almost, that presents those arriving and already living in Palestine. Long takes that are director Amos Gitai’s style, and an unsparing look behind the myth of the nation’s founding.

Ten—Ten moments in a car, with a camera pointed at an Iranian woman and her passengers. We see moments of complicated lives of Iranian women, and from anecdotes and simple conversation a narrative arises, the complicated, difficult life of this recently divorced woman who tugs for power with her pre-teen son. Again, all of this from dashboard mounted cameras.

And then there are those that I’ve already written about: Le Fils, About Schmidt, 17 Times Cecile Cossard, Bowling For Columbine (which won the "al’unanimite" prize, given only every five years ) and Punchdrunk Love (which tied another film for the "Mis-en-Scene" prize).

***

All day Sunday, even before the Palme D’or and other awards were announced, the media stands were being dismantled and packed up. People were saying goodbye. It was like overnight camp, having spent almost two weeks with the same people, new and old friends. But here, they announced the winner of the Palm d’Or at a black tie ceremony with a whole bunch of stars in attendance, and, then everyone goes outside to the ocean and walks by the palm trees because summer is only beginning.


You Talkin' To Me?
Scorsese shows us the half-monty
By Grant Rosenberg

"What's the Difference Between a Duck?" and other Questions
By Grant Rosenberg

Here We Are Now, Entertain Us...
Because We Have Stories To File
By Grant Rosenberg

Pre-Cannes Conference:
The festival's lineup is announced
By Grant Rosenberg
04-22-02